Monday, March 28, 2011

A Local Field Trip


Spring arrives early in Austin, and I had the luxury a few weeks ago of lesson-planning for my Austin Community College Modern Dance I course outdoors. I was so inspired by this experience that I asked my students if they would be interested in taking a field trip for a class outside—to Austin’s Umlauf Sculpture Garden & Museum, which is just around the corner from where we usually meet at Galaxy Dance Studio.

Tanagra Figures at Umlauf
I was met with a resounding “yes” and the readiness to pack up and leave right then! This was before spring break, and I wanted to check in with the Umlauf’s Director of Education, Sheila Fox, and make it an official trip. I also wanted to use the opportunity to teach a bit about the relationship between dance and sculpture and to highlight the direct influence of sculpture on the development of early modern dance practices.

We set a date for the Thursday after spring break, and I used that Tuesday to emphasize movement initiation from the solar plexus—a core element of Duncan’s technique, and an articulation of the body that is highly visible in Umlauf’s sculptures. We also worked on some phrasing from a Duncan dance called the “Cherubim,” focusing on a chase sequence with skip turns. The skater figure in the sculpture garden provides a really clear example of one of the shapes in this dance.

Tanagra Figures at Umlauf
On Thursday, students met me by Umlauf’s “Spirit of Flight,” and we began our class with conscious breathing and a classic Duncan arm lift. We continued to warm up through sways, bobs, and wheels, before journeying down into the garden to skip the larger pathways and learn Duncan's "Tanagra Figures" among the sculptures.  We finished by dancing some of the “Cherubim” phrasing on the pavilion area, and concluded with a beautiful group improvisation.

"Cherubim" chase on the pavilion!
The day was hot, and I think we got a bit dirty (especially practicing a laying down sequence amid fallen leaves), but the movement was joyous and the students were inspired. If only I had daily access to a beautiful outdoor space to share and create within Duncan’s subtle, specific, and soulfully uplifting dance technique. I’m very much looking forward to getting these students outside one more time this semester—check out ACC’s Carnival Ah! in a few weeks, when we’ll have class outdoors at the Rio Grande Campus on Tuesday, April 21st.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Music, Rehearsal, & Artists' Space


Houston is fast becoming a quick road trip! This weekend I zipped down from Austin for first Klytemnestra music rehearsals with Misha, Miranda, the musicians, and the composer. Saturday we met in the music building at the University of Houston—my instructions were to enter the side of the building next to the statue…a contemporary version of Winged Victory (Duncan would have taken that as a good sign).

Winged Victory
The music for this new opera is haunting and beautiful. As a dancer, it is interesting to sit in on the part of the process when the musicians are beginning to integrate the efforts of their solo practice. For this project, I’m still in the learning-the-music stage. For me, the dance movement most organically materializes after I’ve absorbed the music by living with it, listening over and over until I can recall most of the phrasing in my imaginative mind, and I find myself waking up in the morning with the music playing on a loop in my head. I’ve been working with an early recording of the Klytemnestra piece that is only instrumental. After this weekend’s rehearsals, I now have new recordings that include Misha’s vocals and Miranda’s spoken text.

Music Rehearsal at University of Houston
I am loving this representation of Aeschylus’ ancient story. The spoken and sung texts pair inverse chronologies to articulate Klytemnestra’s tragic tale. The actress starts with the end of the story, after Agemmenon’s return—which, from thousands of years of historical distance, we can presume the audience knows—and the operatic text begins with Klytemnestra waiting…marking time for the ten long years that describe the Trojan War.

Rehearsing at Divergence Vocal Theater
It is interesting to me to consider the differences in audience reception of a narrative (book, performance, film, whatever) that is supposed to be telling a story for the first time—that leads the audience members along a step-by-step process of revelation of plot—versus that of one that assumes everyone knows the story. The latter example enables audience members to experience aspects of the performance not limited to intellectual comprehension of a logical series of events. The audience is freed to enjoy rhythms, sounds, and textures that conjure an imaginative and emotive, as well as, an intellectual landscape. In this way, the repetitive act of story-telling serves a ritual-like function. It offers audience members the opportunity to listen somatically and aurally, as well as logically—to hear and to feel the poetic play between the meaning and the sound of the words. And this particular collaborative composition crafts that relationship artfully!

Monday, March 14, 2011

Packaging History


“Oh!” I gasp, out loud, at my desk (at my day job—and, yes, even this artist still has a day job—watch out for a post about juggling personal economic and artistic priorities at some point in the future—Isadora would have loads to say about that state of affairs for artists…)—“What happened,” my boss/co-worker/office-mate, asks. “Did someone die?”

Bass Concert Hall, Austin, TX
Well yes, but—not exactly. I mean, it has been over a year since Merce Cunningham died. And my gasp wasn’t expressing shock and fear. It was excitement (and hope). I knew the Merce Cunningham Dance Company was coming to Austin, and I had urged my Austin Community College modern dance students to go. It was, after all, a historic event. And dance historian is part of who I am. But, I had a work meeting that night—and I had thought about it, but hadn’t yet broached the subject of asking to be excused so that I could see a dance concert. And here was an email from a friend telling me she had an extra ticket.

Thankfully, my day job is in the arts, and my boss, who is also an art historian, told me that I had to go. The Merce Cunningham Dance Company’s Legacy Tour—in Austin for one night only. What a layered concept—a legacy tour. You probably know that in order to avoid the chaos and conflict that erupted over the rights to perform Graham’s work after her death, Cunningham decided that, after his passing, his company would embark on a final tour of his works for a period of two years and then disband—forever.

What a bizarre mode of reception, as an audience member, to sit and watch a dance concert, acutely aware of the historicity of the event? Kind of like seeing a ghost—these bodies, on this stage, trained by Merce, dancing these works for the last time. Tracing patterns through space, with rhythmic variation, highly tuned to the other bodies onstage, organisms operating as parts of a whole.

I’ve never been comfortable with how Cunningham’s creative legacy intellectually stimulates me. As an undergraduate theatre student at Yale, we created works based on chance as an exercise in our study of Cunningham and John Cage. The elements of serendipity and unpredictability inherent in that process excite me. I suppose that is the part of me that embraces improvisation as art and craft.

Two of Duncan’s most profound contributions to modern dance are the element of spontaneity (within craft) and the argument that dance, as an art form, can and should stand on its own two feet—that dance is an art in its own right and not subservient to the music, which partners it. As famous as Duncan is for her musicality, she also experimented with, but rarely performed, dance in silence.

And yet, Cunningham’s creative approach has always seemed a bit cold in its mathematical purity. As a dancer, I move in response to internal impulse—I found my home for artistic creation and expression in Duncan’s technique and repertory because there is a reason to move and movement follows a rhythmic cadence, or wave rhythm, and it is intimately related to the music. We don’t count in Duncan dance—in learning and teaching the choreographies, we sing instead. Once you learn the music for a Duncan dance, you never forget the movements. The music and the dance are simply audible and kinesthetic expressions of the same impulse, the same thought.

And yet, even if Cunningham’s processes seem more mechanized, here are his thoughts, his movement impulses, etched through space on this stage, with these living, breathing (at times audibly) bodies. For the last time. Except that is not quite the case—the company will be disbanded, but the rights to the dances will be maintained by a trust, and they will continue to license and set the works. So even in this final transition—this passing from life to death to legend, Cunningham has carefully crafted how his work will move from living art form to historical artifact.

What if Duncan had done this? What if Duncan had mandated that “dance capsules” be made of her works and that her artistic legacy was to be carefully controlled? Thank goodness this was not the case! Although as Duncan dancers, we are still fighting for historians and dance professionals to understand and respect the technique and craftswomanship underpinning Duncan’s work, thank goodness she didn’t seek to control the final reception of her gesture.

Duncan’s dance is entwined with the initial impulse to move, but it does not control the landing—such a tough concept for mechanically trained dancers to embrace. The line in the dance is very specific, but it is the result of the movement, not the product of willfully executed intention. There is an element of letting go—and in that space, that softening at the solar plexus predicated by the exhale—that is where freedom lives. And thank goodness that element of Duncan dance, both technical and metaphorical, is not encapsulated in an historic moment, but expansive, vibrant, and very much relevant nearly a century after her time. I wonder, what will be the impact of Cunningham’s work, a hundred years from today?

Monday, March 7, 2011

Duncan & Stanislavsky



Constantin Stanislavsky saw Duncan’s first Moscow concert in 1905 and later recorded his impressions of her in his autobiography My Life in Art.  He describes his reaction as that of a “newly baptized disciple,” and expounds, “when I became acquainted with her methods…I came to know that in different corners of the world, due to conditions unknown to us, various people in various spheres sought in art for the same naturally born creative principles” (Stanislavsky, My Life in Art).

Duncan in Russia
Duncan and Stanislavsky met when she returned to Moscow in 1908, and he reminisces, “we understood each other almost before we had said a single word” (My Life in Art).  Both Duncan and Stanislavsky crafted their performance arts through their ability to organically convert an internal, emotional impulse into expression.  Both artists were able to achieve a state of being present in the moment and imaginative circumstance of performance and to respond with either dialogue or movement to the textual or musical cues.  Both artists sought to create a reciprocal dialogue between life and art, and they maintained a correspondence continuing their dialogue about their performance methods.

Duncan's Moscow School
Duncan wrote to Stanislavsky, “Today, I worked all morning and put many new ideas into my work. Rhythms again. It is you who have given me these ideas” (Victor Seroff, The Real Isadora). Stanislavsky wrote to Duncan, “You have shattered my principles. After your departure, I kept looking in my art for the thing you have created in yours. It is beauty, as simple as nature” (The Real Isadora (by the way, this book is the only source where I have found English translations of parts of the Duncan/ Stanislavsky correspondence— when I was in Moscow in 2005, I requested to view the letters, which are housed in an archive at Moscow Art Theatre, and my request was denied)). Although Stanislavsky was unsuccessful in his attempts to bring Duncan's school to Russia, in 1921, when Duncan finally did establish a Russian school, her students were frequent audience members at Stanislavsky's Moscow Art Theatre productions.

Building for Moscow School 2005
Glimpsing the working dialogue between these two great artists is exciting. It feels kind of like being a voyeur through the lens of time. I wonder, at what point, they realized the parts they were mutually playing in the revolution of performance methods? I also wonder what texts future historians will use to gain insight into artists' creative relationships, especially as we continue to move into a paperless, digital age. Emails and texts have displaced old-fashioned letters as the primary means of written correspondence. But perhaps blogs, with their innate capacity to self-archive, will still be around to provide future historians some clue as to the creative practices and processes of artists of our time.

Look out for more ruminations on artists’ awareness of their own historicity in next week’s post—the Merce Cunningham Dance Company’s final tour is coming to Austin.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Impulse to Expression & Maturation, A Common Denominator of Theatre and Dance


Klytemnestra rehearsal
I've been thinking a lot about the relationship between dance and theatre as performance arts, especially this past week! Expect ruminations on my new collaboration with Misha Penton and Divergence Vocal Theater and thoughts on middle school one act play competitions to be posted here soon...

Okay—last week was busy! First of all, congrats to my middle school one act play performers, who took second place at the PSIA one act play competition, and are now headed for the state contest in Fort Worth in May. Since September, I’ve been coaching the five seventh-grade girls in David Campton’s Some of My Best Friends Are Smiths, a great play exploring the issue of discrimination and casting it in an absurd context. These girls worked hard and developed a strong ensemble, and I was beyond proud of their performance on Saturday.

In addition to daily one act play rehearsals, last week I began collaboration on another project with Houston’s Divergence Vocal Theater—a new opera Klytemnestra. In preparation for this project, we have been researching past productions that tell the story of Aeschylus’ Oresteia, including Martha Graham’s Clytemnestra. 

Klytemnestra rehearsal, February 2011
I love that Graham choreographed her Clytemnestra at the age of 65—one of the greatest legacies of modern dance is the opportunity for women to create and perform at all stages of life. Even in the recent New Yorker, Tina Fey laments the fate of actresses after 40, in terms of limited movie contracts and single motherhood.  And this is in the year 2011. Women in the performing arts are still fighting for career longevity, almost a century after Duncan gave her last performance at the age of 50, months shy of her tragic death. Of course, the longevity of her career was an anomaly in her day—and such longevity, for female performers, is still the exception rather than the rule.

Oddly, this seems true for both theatre and dance performers, for both actresses and dancers. And, yet, in both fields, there is a maturation of artistry that takes place over the course of time. Isadora’s sister-in-law, Margherita Duncan, writes of Duncan’s critics, “If they had stopped to realize that a long line is harder to draw than a short one, a long note harder to sing than a long one, a slow movement is harder to sustain than a quick one, they might have recognized that the change in Isadora’s work was not substitution, but evolution” (The Art of the Dance). I look forward to the day when mature female performers are sought after for the quality of their gesture and the depth of their understanding of human behavior, conveyed through their craftswomanship in performance. 

An impulse, a reason to move, to react, to respond is the common denominator of theatre and dance expression. I fell in love with Duncan when I realized that she shared the same understanding of intention in performance articulated by Constantine Stanislavsky— both arts teach us self-observation. We learn to understand our own unconscious impulses, and, perhaps, to interrupt those impulses. To make choices based on our self-understanding— and through those choices, to begin to craft, to live, life as art. That is the ultimate lesson I hope to convey to both my dance and theater students. And that is also the lesson I seek to explore through my current collaborative and creative processes.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Budgeting Education, Valuing Expression


Budget talk is everywhere. If you are in Austin, you know that the reality of balancing school budgets equals cuts to education in the form of school closures and job loss. The past few weeks have seemed pretty unbelievable as parents scour the books, picket, and protest the shutting down of schools in Austin’s Independent School District. As an arts educator, I’m used to the constant threat of cuts to the arts in schools, but right now, entire schools are being cut!

Tunics at the State Capitol (Austin)
As an Americans for the Arts supporter, my inbox has been full of warnings of pending votes in Congress on cuts to the National Endowment for the Arts, with urgings to contact my representatives and express my desire to save arts programming. I follow the steps, fill out the email form, and even personalize it to my perspective as an arts performer, teacher, scholar, nonprofit board member, and administrator--only to find out that the measure passed the House by a margin of 8 votes. If this stands, the NEA budget will decrease by close to 25% (or down $43 million from its current $167.5). Thankfully, the bill still hasn’t passed the Senate, and they begin consideration when their session resumes on February 28th. It’s not too late to contact your senator through Americans for the Arts and pledge your support for the NEA.

What would Isadora think about all this? I imagine she would encourage us to think about how, as a society, we are expressing what we value. The mark of value in a capitalistic economy is currency, money. We express value by how much we are willing to pay for particular goods or services. Prices are driven up and down according to supply and demand and the logic of the system is not influenced by the kind of values that make up a moral code. There is no inherent conscience in capitalism—if we are choosing to organize not only our national but, more and more, our world culture according to capitalistic principles, it is imperative that we not lose sight of elements of our human culture that teach creativity, critical thinking, and compassion for and consideration of other people and perspectives. Education and the arts are essential—let’s value them as such!

Where will we be if we continue to shortchange thought (education) and expression (arts)? From my perspective, if we do not preserve time, space, and opportunity for the development of thought and expression, freedom will atrophy.  What is freedom if we devalue critical thinking and place limits on our capacity to shape thought into expression through communication?

Duncan’s work was not just about personal expression, it was about making an argument for individual, creative expression as an inalienable human right. Duncan’s was not a passive perspective, and her courage and willingness to use both her body and her voice to express what she believed to be important is, perhaps, the most inspiring aspect of her legacy. Let's honor her and learn from her example by continuing in her (bare)foot steps!

Monday, February 14, 2011

Dancing for Joy and Transformation through Music


“There are perhaps grown people who have forgotten the language of the soul. But children understand. It is only necessary to say to them: ‘Listen to the music with your soul. Now, while you are listening, do you not feel an inner self awakening deep within you—that it is by its strength that your head is lifted, your arms are raised, that you are walking slowly toward the light?’ This awakening is the first step in dancing, as I understand it” (Duncan, The Art of the Dance).

When I watch my young dancers at the Girls’ School of Austin transform through movement and music, I understand what Duncan means. These dancers have an impulse to action, to movement, to expression.  They are unselfconsciously responsive to music—their footwork reflects rhythmic changes, their bodies slow down or speed up, they gesture broadly or find stillness and repose. My task as their teacher is not to teach them how to move, but to provide room and opportunity for them to dance with full-bodied expression through space. I offer them different musical rhythms and encourage them to notice how their bodies are responding—I offer shape and refinement to their natural impulse for gestural expression.

The result is a joyous transformation through music and movement that is a delight to experience, and we so enjoyed sharing with the grandparents who came to celebrate Community Day in honor of Valentine’s Day.  The program we danced consisted of two structured improvisations, enabling the dancers to explore freedom of expression, and two Duncan choreographies, the “Prelude,” and the “Tanagra Figures.” We sandwiched the learned choreographies in between the more free-form dances to encourage the girls to dance the learned movements with a sense of improvisational spontaneity.

Last week, I also had the opportunity to experience the masterful playing of pianist Emanuel Ax.  The all-Schubert program he gave last Thursday night at the Bates Recital Hall was breathtaking—or breath-giving, for he was very much in dialogue with his instrument. He played conversationally—there was a rhythm between listening and expressing, and his gentle touch provided the conduit through which the conversation flowed. I’ve never seen or heard anyone play piano with the quality of gentleness he embodied, and his ease enabled the more dynamic moments to explode without a forced willfulness.  Needless to say, I was dancing on the inside—and I must have been one of many, as the concert hall was packed. I can only imagine what it would be like to actually get to dance to his live playing. One can dream, right?

I highly value the opportunity to dance with live music, and am excited for my upcoming collaborations with Divergence Vocal Theater, so I can continue to explore the dialogue between dancers and musicians.  I am also excited to get my young dancers in a studio space, and I’ve officially booked at least one week of summer dance camp at Galaxy Dance Studios in Austin. Registration details will be up on my MB Arts website soon. In the meantime, feel free to contact me with any questions.